Today we’re doing a little comparison, playing with the Assassin’s Creed original to see how it performs on different CPUs. For those of you who do not know, the origin of the killer race was released recently and caused a stir in the PC tech community due to its PC CPU usage.
When it was released, some media outlets had benchmark issues and it was quickly apparent that the game was too CPU intensive and not ARMA 3 or Planet Coaster.
Instead of heavily taxing some threads, the game consumes a lot of money. As a result of the Threadiper 1920X reported, etc., the new quadcourse was killed and the game was reported to be unable to play on the Core i5-7600K and attracted our attention the most.
We’ve seen 7600K and other quad-core CPU conflicts in 64-player Battlefield 1 battles, and even though performance isn’t always good, it’s not always good. But it can certainly be played in our opinion.
However, I believe it was the computer base result that caused the most excitement, as they showed that the Core i5-7600K was trampled by the Ryzen 5 1500X as it could only match the Ryzen 3 1300X.
However, the low 1% results were the most shocking, as the i5-7600K dropped to 41 fps, making it slightly slower than the 1300X. To be honest, I’m not sure how that was possible. But let’s ignore it for a moment.
Essentially, the 7600K Ryzen 5 is about 30% slower than the 1600X and about 40% slower than the 7700K.
In comparison, the results published by GameGPU about 3 days ago showed that the 7600K never dropped below 60 fps, and as a result it easily defeated the Risen 5 1400, beating the Risen 3 CPU.
High core count, Ryzen parts still performed very well in testing, but the 7600K was hardly bad.
Take a look where each media test is the best, as I can tell that GameGPU has tested some of the more demanding parts of the game, which is misleading. So we decided to take a look and see what had happened.
As a CPU benchmark, we found that riding your horse is the way to get to the open city of Siwa (Siwa), in this case through camels and jogging, usually with lots of non-player characters. Give hard time to cpu
So, with the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and three quality presets, let’s look at some of the results in graph format before examining some of the gameplay.
Standard
Starting with ultra-high-quality presets, we used the GTX 1080 Ty, here after all, the 8th gen core series is limited to 90 fps, with a low 1% result at 71 fps.
The 7700K corresponds to the predicted average, but is 7% slower for the lowest because it is often near the maximum.
Then we see a big drop for the 7600K, hitting 52 fps lower, it’s 21% slower than the 7700K, and 27% slower than the new Core i5-8400.
This also means that it is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 5 1600X, although it is faster than the R5 1500X.
We want to state that all CPUs were tested using the same DDR4-3200 CL14 memory. I’m going to watch some gameplay videos soon, but both the 7600K and 1500X offer high performance in a busy segment. of the game
The quality of the presets is lower, the performance is better, and the Core i5-7600K in particular is better.
While the minimum frame rate for the 1500X has increased by 17%, the 7600K has increased from 27% to 66 fps and can now deliver very simple performance.
With an 8th generation core processor, the 7700K can still maximize GTX 1080 ty.
Reducing this to determine the Middle East would slightly increase the minimum frame rate of the Core i5-7600K and Risen CPUs.
Interestingly, this increases the minimum and average frame rate of the Core i7-7700K as well as quite a few 8th generation CPUs, so it is suggested that the Ryzen and 7600K processors are causing bottlenecks in the system.
Here’s a quick glance at how the 7700K, 7600K, and R5 1500X are boosted using their pre-set quality settings. We saw some solid and consistent benefits as the GTX 1080 Ti has more breathing space with the 7700K.
The 7600K is almost at its peak using the high, while the R5 1500X has almost no improvement from high to medium.
Sports picture
We’ve seen the graphs and I know people are screaming that bar graphs don’t tell the whole story, the 7600K is probably a mess.
In an effort to remove such noise, here is a look at some of the gameplay videos recorded with an external capture device. All pictures were recorded at 1080p using the super high quality preset, therefore in the worst case scenario.
